https://help.tallysolutions.com/docs/te9rel60/release_notes_6_0/release_notes_6_0.htm

Release Notes for Tally.ERP 9 Release 6

We are happy to bring to you our GST-ready product Tally.ERP 9 Release 6. This release will help you create GST transactions from Day 1. In addition, we also fixed other issues in the areas of compliance, accounting, and so on.

Highlights

After installing Tally.ERP 9, you can quickly get started with GST in a few easy steps. Click here for more information.

 

Product Improvements

Accounting Reports

Accounting Vouchers

Bank Reconciliation

Export

Inventory

Multi Currency

Printing

POS

Performance Improvement

VAT

Excise for Manufacturer

Excise for Traders

TCS

TDS

Payroll

TDL

 

 

Coming Soon

In our upcoming releases, you can look forward to:

     GST invoicing using remote access

     Calculation of Cess for Cigarettes (non-filters and filters) based on value and quantity

Accounting Masters

     Ledgers could not be saved when copied from one company to another in the following method:

o     Two companies were loaded.

o     The ledger was created or altered in a company migrated from Release 4.9x and F3 was pressed to select another company, and the ledger was saved.

This issue is resolved.

Accounting Reports

     You can view the cost based on the stock valuation method using the option Show Cost based on stock valuation? in the sales register configuration. There may be a change in the Gross Profit value in the sales register after enabling this option.

Accounting Vouchers

     A duplicated payment voucher was blank if in a payment voucher,

o     The option Enable default accounting allocations? was enabled in the Voucher Type Alteration screen.

o     This option was later disabled after passing a payment voucher.

o     The payment voucher was duplicated.

This issue is resolved.

     The rate of a stock item did not get updated when the price level was altered in a duplicated sales voucher. This issue is resolved.

     The symbol % was suffixed to the value of an additional ledger in a sales voucher, if the Type of calculation was selected as Based on Quantity in Default Accounting Entries of the sales voucher type. This was observed in purchase vouchers, receipt note, delivery note, credit note, and debit note as well.

This issue is resolved.

Bank Reconciliation

     In bank reconciliation, when a multi-currency transaction was created against an unreconciled transaction (from imported bank statement), the value in the Amount field of the transaction was considered as the base currency, instead of the foreign currency. As a result, the user was unable to save the voucher. This issue is resolved.

Export

     When Purchase Bills Pending report was exported ledger-wise to MS Excel, the stock items appeared in the Party Name column. This issue is resolved.

     When the Bank Reconciliation Statement was exported to MS Excel 2007, the values of Balance as per company books and Amount not reflected in bank were appearing under the Bank Date field. This issue is resolved.

     If a purchase or sales order was passed for multiple stock items and tracked in a journal voucher, then in the Stock Item Allocations screen, the purchase or sales order number appeared for selection only for the first stock item. This issue is resolved.

Now, the purchase or sales order appears for selection in the Stock Item Allocation screen of the journal voucher for all the stock items of the purchase or sales order.

Inventory

     In a delivery note or sales invoice, if stock items with batch and godown enabled were partially tracked, the remaining quantity i.e., the quantity of stock items not tracked, did not appear. This issue is resolved.

     When multiple companies were loaded, stock group details were not displayed in the Godown Summary report. This was observed when:

o     The alias name of the stock group had numeric or alphanumeric values or

o     The first letter of the alias name occurred before the first letter of the stock group name in the alphabetic order.

This issue is resolved.

     In the Godown Summary report, on drilling down from the stock group level to the stock item level, the closing balance of a stock items were not appearing. This occurred if the stock item was created by specifying only the quantity, without the rate. This issue is resolved.

     In the Stock Summary, Stock Item Monthly Summary and Stock Vouchers reports, the closing stock value calculated for the alternate unit was incorrect when

o     The option Show using Alternate Units? was enabled in the F12: Configure.

o     The period was altered (by pressing F2) to the date on which the debit/credit note was issued.

Also, in the Stock Summary and Stock Item Monthly Summary reports, the alternate unit was blank in the Inwards/Outwards Quantity column. This occurred when the options Show Opening Balance?, Show goods inwards? and Show goods outwards? were enabled in the F12: Configure. This issue is resolved.

     The Inwards and Outwards details were blank on viewing the Stock Summary report for a stock item for a period, if the stock item was created by enabling the option Treat all sales as new manufacture? or Treat all purchases as consumed?. This issue is resolved.

     The manufacturing date of a stock item in a purchase voucher was modified automatically, when

o     Two optional purchase voucher were passed for a stock item enabled to track manufacturing date.

o     The first optional voucher was converted to regular and the date was altered to a date later than the second optional voucher.

This issue is resolved.

Multi Currency

     The unadjusted forex gain/loss did not get updated in reports such Ledger Vouchers, Balance Sheet, Trial Balance, Funds Transfer, Ratio Analysis, and so on. This was observed when:

o     Two or more multi-currency transactions were passed with different Rates of Exchange on the same or different dates

o     One of these transactions was altered, deleted or cancelled

This issue is resolved.

Printing

     In a sales voucher, the buyers PAN was printed in the consignee details section also, when the consignee details were entered by the user in the Party Details screen. This issue is resolved.

Now, the buyers PAN is printed only in the buyer’s details section.

     The country name of a party was printed before the state name in a sales or purchase invoice, if

o     The option Print country with address? was enabled in General Printing Configuration screen.

o     Enable supplementary details? was set to No and Print default name and address of party? was set to Yes in Voucher Configuration screen.

This issue is resolved.

     The date of opening balance carried forward is captured accurately when you print Ledger Vouchers report with multiple financial years, and with the Method of Balancing set as Yearly in print configuration.

POS

     You can filter vouchers in POS Register for a specific buyer name or party name using the F12: Range filter.

Performance Improvement

     The error Out of Memory was displayed while pre-closing a large number of sales orders in a 32 bit Tally.ERP 9 application. This issue is resolved.

You can pre-close any number of sales orders in 32 bit Tally.ERP 9 application.

VAT Improvements

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Delhi

Gujarat

Jammu & Kashmir

Karnataka

Kerala

Maharashtra

Odisha

Puducherry

Punjab

Tamil Nadu

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

 

VAT Improvements for all States

     If you enabled VAT analysis and printed an invoice containing an item with zero value, the VAT Amount displayed in the VAT analysis section was incorrect. This issue is resolved.

     The VAT analysis section was blank when a tax invoice was exported to MS Excel although the option Print VAT/CST Analysis of Items? was enabled. This issue is resolved.

     The following issues were observed when a sales invoice with 4 or more VATable items was altered to change the value of all items except one to zero:

o     The assessable value of the transaction displayed in the VAT form report was wrong.

o     The transaction was incorrectly grouped under Mismatch due to tax amount modified in voucher exception.

These issues are resolved.

     While recording a transaction, if you enabled the option Allow entry of rate inclusive of tax for stock item? in the Voucher Configuration screen, there was an increase in the decimal value of the Rate (Incl. of Tax), including VAT and additional tax values, in alteration mode of the voucher.

This issue is resolved.

     In an invoice with the option Allow modification of tax details for VAT? enabled, if you selected a taxable zero-valued sales ledger by entering the assessable value in the Tax Classification details screen, with additional ledger and VAT ledger, the following issues were observed:

o     On pressing O to override the conflict and accept the invoice, the VAT amount was displayed as doubled in the triangulation report.

o     On pressing Enter to save, the transaction was moved to the Not relevant for returns/annexures section of the triangulation report.

These issues are resolved.

     If you selected a zero-valued stock item predefined with MRP in an invoice enabled with Rate (Incl. of Tax), the MRP was displayed as the rate, inclusive of tax and rate per unit. These rates were retained even after they were removed. This issue is resolved.

     If you viewed an invoice, recorded with MRP and a different Rate (Incl. of Tax), in alteration mode, the MRP/Marginal amount was displayed as the Rate (Incl. of Tax), and the VAT amount was getting recalculated. This issue is resolved.

VAT State-wise

Bihar

     The amount of excess tax paid in the return period was not captured in the column 25.2 Vat paid to the extent of VAT payable in the month/months of the quarter of Form RT1. This issue is resolved.

Chhattisgarh

     VAT rate of 14.5%, revised from 14%, is supported in sections 4 Taxable Turnover and 10 Computation of Input Tax Rebate (ITR) of VAT Form 17.

Delhi

     If you recorded a transaction with Interstate Sales – Zero Rated as  the Nature of transaction, the assessable value was displayed in the column Sale against I-form of Annexure-31. This issue is resolved.

     On exporting the annexures of a particular quarter to the e-annexures template, transaction details for only a month were exported, and not for the entire quarter. This issue is resolved.

Gujarat

     The liability of tax on purchase was not considered if there was any value in box 14 of Part IV-V-VI of Form 201. Due to this, the value captured in box 18 of the form was incorrect. This issue is resolved.

Jammu & Kashmir

     Annexure-48 could not be exported to the e-annexure template in Microsoft Excel 2007 format. This issue is resolved.

Karnataka

     It was observed by some users that when the period set in the Gateway of Tally was 1-4-2016 to 31-3-2017, and the Form VAT 100 report was viewed for February 2016, the value of Excess Input Credit Brought Forward was displayed incorrectly. This issue is resolved.

     In the e-Sugam Configuration screen, a note is provided on the applicability of the transaction value of sales invoice.

Kerala

     The Gross Value displayed in the print out of Form 8 of a tax invoice was incorrect when the option Use separate discount columns in invoices? was enabled in the Inventory Features under F11: Features.

This issue is resolved.

     New nature of transactions - Interstate Purchase Exempt – With Form C and Interstate Sales Exempt – With Form C - are provided to support recording and reporting of interstate transactions with tax exemption against Form C.

Maharashtra

     The total value was not appearing for the column Net Taxable Value (Rs.) in the Purchase Annexure report. This issue is resolved.

Odisha

     The error message “Commodity Name Does Not Exists” was appearing while exporting Annexure G details to the Microsoft Excel template. This issue is resolved.

 

Puducherry

     On recording an excise sales invoice with excise duty and CST ledgers, and printing the Rule 11 invoice, the CST ledger was not displayed in the printed copy. This issue is resolved.

Punjab

     The purchase return transaction was not captured under Customer wise summary of the sheet VAT-24 in the Form VAT 15 e-VAT template, but the net purchase value after returns was captured. This was occurring when the options Consolidate retail purchase? and Consolidate retail purchase Commodity wise? were first enabled and later disabled while exporting the form. This issue is resolved.

Tamil Nadu

     The taxable interstate sales transactions made to unregistered dealers were not captured in Annexure 22. This issue is resolved.

     Annexures 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 25 now support the latest validation requirements provided by the commercial taxes department.

Uttar Pradesh

     The VAT Refundable value displayed in the Form 24 report was not captured in box 14(iv) of the physical Form VAT XXIV and e-VAT Form 24. This issue is resolved.

     Incorrect address details were displayed for a party in the printed copy of Annexure A. This occurred when the address details were not defined for one of the parties captured in the annexure. This issue is resolved.

Uttarakhand

     If the value of a transaction was more than Rs 1 lakh, the values were exported with a comma (,) into the Annexure 17C template. Due to this the field Sales Amount (in Annexure 17C) and the corresponding field in VAT Form III displayed the amount as #VALUE!. This issue is resolved.

Now, values above Rs 1 lakh will be exported without comma (,) across all annexures and VAT Form III.

West Bengal

     The Rate of Tax was not captured under the section 46. Sale of three main taxable commodities (in terms of sale value) during the return period of the Form-14 xml file. This issue is resolved.

     The POS invoice recorded without party address details was appearing with the exception Address is Empty under Annexure B III, although the invoice value was less than Rs. 50,000. This issue is resolved.

     The transactions recorded by selecting the party ledger predefined with Composition dealer type and alphanumeric VAT TIN No., were wrongly captured in Form - 14 report under Incomplete/mismatch in information (to be resolved), with the exception Invalid TIN. This issue is resolved.

Nepal VAT

     To support recording and printing of PAN/IT number of customers and suppliers:

o     The field PAN/IT No. is provided in Ledger Creation screen for masters created under Sundry Creditors and Sundry Debtors.

o     The field Print Party’s PAN/Income Tax No. is provided in Invoice Print Configuration screen to allow printing of the tax registration details of party in the invoice.

 

Excise for Manufacturer

     When you recorded a stock journal or manufacturing journal voucher by selecting multiple items, each having a different unit of measurement, the Daily Stock Register was appearing blank if viewed by selecting one of these items. This issue is resolved.

     Incorrect assessable value was printed next to the field Output VAT in the printed copy of Rule 11 excise invoice, when:

o     The data was migrated from Release 4.9x to Release 5.x.

o     The excise sales invoice was created against a partially consumed sales order.

This issue is resolved.

     The value of the discount ledger was not considered while calculating excise duty in an Excise Supplementary Invoice that was recorded to capture change in item rate. This issue is resolved.

     The value of discount ledger was not considered while calculating excise duty in an excise credit note when the option Use separate discount column in invoices? was enabled under Inventory Features of F11: Features. This issue is resolved.

     When an excise sales invoice recorded with VAT and additional tax of 2.50% was printed, the tax rate displayed, inside brackets next to the additional tax ledger, was displayed as 250% instead of 2.50% in the printed copy. This issue is resolved.

 

Excise for Traders

     The Amount of Duty Involved displayed in Form 2 included additional duty on imports although the option Is Additional Duty Imports (SAD) Not Pass On? was set to Yes in the sales transaction. This issue is resolved.

     The error message “Error in TDL, 'Part:TraderInv OpPageBreak' Insufficient Height to allocate!" was displayed while printing an excise sales invoice, if the option Print as Commercial Invoice? was disabled in the Invoice Print Configuration screen. This issue is resolved.

     Incorrect alignment was observed in the PDF generated by exporting the excise tax invoice with excise jurisdiction details and ECC number. This issue is resolved.

TCS

     The lower/zero-rated TCS collection transactions were displayed accurately in TCS Form 27EQ report. However, when the return was saved and exported in text format, the DD and CD details were not getting exported. This issue is resolved.

TDS

     TDS was not being deducted when the TDS amount was less than Rs. 1.50, if expense booking and TDS deduction were done in separate vouchers. This issue is resolved.

     Transactions of a ledger that was configured with two separate lower deduction TDS rates were appearing under Deduction at Normal Rate and not under Lower Rate Taxable Expense in Form 26Q report. This was occurring when,

o     Two separate lower deduction TDS rates with different applicable dates were configured in the ledger master of the party.

o     Two transactions were recorded such that one TDS rate defined in the ledger was applied in transaction recorded on earlier date and second TDS rate was applied in the latter transaction.

o     The Form 26Q report was generated for period that included dates of both the transactions, and the transaction recorded on former date was not appearing under Lower Rate Taxable Expense but was appearing under Deduction at Normal Rate.

This issue is resolved.

     When the same challan number was received for multiple TDS payments made to a bank for different monthly return periods, and if the same was specified in TDS Challan Reconciliation report in respective payment transactions, the following issues were observed while validating the e-tds files:

o The sequence of the payment vouchers was changed in the file.

o The errors T-FV-3001 and T-FV-3002 were displayed.

This issue is resolved.

     After booking the TDS expenses, if the journal voucher was recorded to deduct TDS by pressing Ctrl+P, the TDS amount was not displayed in Deduction at Normal Rate of TDS Ledger Vouchers report of Form 26Q. This issue is resolved.

Payroll

     The salary amount was not captured in the column Amount paid/credited of the section Summary of amount paid/credited and tax deducted at source thereon in respect of the employee in Part A of Form 16. This issue is resolved.

     If the option Use for Payroll? was enabled in a ledger, it did not appear during subsequent alteration of the ledger. As a result, the option could not be modified. This issue is resolved.

     The order of appearance of Pay Heads were changed in a payroll voucher when new or existing sets of pay heads were added or altered, with a new effective date, in the Salary Details alteration screen. This issue is resolved.

TDL

     The attribute ActionEx is introduced to enhance the multi-action support at button or key level. It allows you to specify multiple actions.

     The action Do If is enhanced to support conditional action execution in TDL definitions like button, and it is a system action. Do If executes the given action when the condition evaluates to True.

     When the order number was empty in item allocation, the values of the UDFs used for batch allocations in Receipt Note and Delivery Note vouchers were not getting stored. This issue is resolved.

     Get requests sent from Tally.ERP 9 using the TDL artefacts DataSource, RemoteURL, and HTTPPost, include a default header content–type:xml.

     In the TallyShop screen, when the Recently Added Add-Ons list was empty, Tally.ERP 9 was showing the message Error in TDL. Line: LineMKPHomeRAInfo Cannot have explode on Multi Line!. This issue is resolved.

     On using the TDL actions, Exec Command, Exec Command Ex, Browse URL, or Browse URL Ex, to execute Scanner.exe, Recorder.exe, and PDF.exe of the application iBall, Tally.ERP 9 was giving an error. This issue is resolved.